The hardest races
How hard is Milan San Remo, and how does it compare to other grand races. First of all, what means “Hard race” ? Some easy races can become a nightmare when it starts raining or stormy winds set in . How can we appreciate the devastating efffects on the human body of the cobblestones in Paris-Roubaix ? We could argue until the end of times about distance, altimeters, type of pavements, short or longer climbs, wind, snow etc… but the bottomline is what it costs to the cyclists metabolic systems. Thinking of meaningful criteria, the first coming to my mind is the total amount of energy in kilojoule (or kilocalorie) needed to finish the race. Also, how demanding is this race on your anaerobic metbolism i.e. in what way and how many times did you exhaust and restore your anaerobic battery ?
I collected the power data of a particular WT profesional cyclist, made a full ECP analysis to determine his relevant thresholds.
Here are his ECP or Extended Critical Power data:
Recovery threshold RT = 345 W
Maximal Aerobic Power MAP = 449 W
Super Critical Power SCP = 475 W
Anaerobic Capacity W’ = 19.6 kJ
Estimated VO2max = 88 ml/kg/min
Next I chose 6 of his races and performed an Exhaustion-Recovery analysis with the help of my Typhoon software to compute the overall energy demand, the aerobic energy score, the slow death load SDL, and the fast death load FDL.
The results are shown in the next 3 bar graphs
In short; The Amstel Gold race scores highest on all dificulty scores, MSR scores only on third place and is also very low on the SDL score
In order to understand these somewhat surprising results we have to look at the details of the anaerobic balance W’bal
Detailed Analysis of Milan San Remo
Detailed Analysis of the Amstel Gold race